
If you have ever found yourself listening to a person explaining his or her position on an issue and thinking: “Are you hearing yourself?” though you may not have realized it at the time, you were commenting on that person’s ability to think critically. If you failed to follow that thought through by evenly responding to the speaker by listing factual, objective ways in which the argument fails to sustain his or her claim, you are guilty of the same transgression.
Critical thinking is a combination of several separate practices:
- analyzing the elements of another person’s argument in order to judge the validity of his or her’s claim,
- considering the process by which you broke down the other person’s argument and came to a decision about it, and
- constructing a response to the argument that is constructive and non-offensive.
To think critically about a claim is to scrutinize:
- the evidence used to support it,
- the method used to obtain that evidence,
- how that evidence is interpreted, and
- if the pieces of evidence are fit together in a logical manner that sustains the claim.
